Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729275›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026

Communication and medical errors: a bibliometric analysis of research trends and knowledge structures.

Birgit Hladschik-Kermer, Olena Litvinova, Gernot Gerger, Michał Ławiński, Maima Matin, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Eva Hollmann, Alina Volkmar, Magdalena Eitenberger, Atanas G Atanasov and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Birgit Hladschik-KermerUnit Medical Psychology, Department of Public Mental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Olena LitvinovaLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gernot GergerLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michał ŁawińskiDepartment of Biotechnology and Nutrigenomics, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Magdalenka, Poland.
Maima MatinDepartment of Biotechnology and Nutrigenomics, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Magdalenka, Poland.
Maria Kletecka-PulkerLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eva HollmannLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alina VolkmarLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Magdalena EitenbergerLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Atanas G AtanasovLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas Wochele-ThomaLudwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Communication is increasingly positioned in patient safety research as a cross-cutting domain influencing multiple care processes. However, its structural organization within the scientific literature remains insufficiently integrated. Objective: This study aims to conduct a large-scale bibliometric analysis of the scientific field linking communication and medical errors and to propose a conceptual communication governance framework integrating the identified communication domains into a coherent structure relevant to healthcare, including nursing practice. Methods: We conducted a bibliometric analysis of 13,431 publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (search date: 21 February 2026). Publication trends, thematic evolution, keyword co-occurrence, and international collaboration networks were analyzed using Web of Science analytical tools, the bibliometrix R package, and VOSviewer. To ensure robustness, results were cross-validated with an equivalent Scopus dataset. Results: Publication activity increased exponentially after 2000, exceeding 1,000 publications annually after 2020. Four developmental phases were identified: clinical-descriptive (1964-1999), systemic patient safety (2000-2010), team- and patient-centered (2011-2019), and digital and hybrid communication (2020-2026). Five major thematic clusters emerged: pharmacotherapy safety, teamwork and human factors, information transfer and patient-centered communication, digital infrastructure, and organizational safety culture. The United States, England, and Australia dominated scientific output, with contributions from 139 countries/regions overall. Communication is embedded in multiple patient safety areas across the knowledge network. Cross-database analysis established strong temporal consistency between the Web of Science and Scopus datasets Conclusion: The findings suggest that communication is consistently conceptualized in the literature as a multilevel governance domain within patient safety systems. The proposed conceptual communication governance framework provides a structured basis for refining empirical data, developing clinical risk indicators, and conducting safety research involving nurses.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecommunicationdigitalizationhealthcaremedical errorspatient safetyteamwork

Identifiers

PMID42729275
PMCPMC13561824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.