Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729252›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

The Age Friendly Supermarket Index: a Delphi study and psychometric analysis.

Sok Leng Che, Wai In Lei, Sok Man Leong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sok Leng CheNursing and Health Education Research Centre, Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macao, Macao SAR, China.
Wai In LeiNursing and Health Study Centre, Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macao, Macao SAR, China.
Sok Man LeongResearch Management and Development Department, Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macao, Macao SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Person-environment interactions shape how individuals evaluate their surroundings, and perceived age friendliness influences intentions to age in place. Supermarkets, as essential components of daily urban life, play a critical role in supporting older adults' community participation. This study aimed to develop and validate the Age Friendly Supermarket Index (AFSI), a comprehensive tool to assess and enhance supermarket age friendliness for older customers. Methods: Indicators were generated through a literature review, followed by two Delphi rounds, cognitive interviews, and pilot testing. The AFSI was validated using survey data from 387 older adults in Macao. Results: The finalized AFSI includes 33 indicators across three domains: (i) environmental design and customer service, (ii) convenience and safety assurance, and (iii) product arrangement and aisle planning. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a three factor structure. The overall index showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's Conclusion: The AFSI is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating supermarket age friendliness and can guide improvements to support age-friendly shopping environments.

Indexed as

Food MarketsPsychometricsAgedAged, 80 and overAging in PlaceDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesage-friendlyDelphiindexreliabilitysupermarketvalidity

Identifiers

PMID42729252
PMCPMC13561940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.