Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729218›Full record

ArticleAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2026

Graded levels of wheat oligopeptides relieve feed change-induced intestinal damage via modulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in broilers.

Yutong Fu, Zhengda Lu, Xin Fang, Cangjue Bianba, Xiaoyue Shi, Qinghe Cai, Yinuo Zhao, Shimeng Huang, Qiugang Ma, Cheng Ji and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yutong FuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Poultry Nutrition and Feed Technology Innovation Team, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Zhengda LuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Poultry Nutrition and Feed Technology Innovation Team, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xin FangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Poultry Nutrition and Feed Technology Innovation Team, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Cangjue BianbaState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Poultry Nutrition and Feed Technology Innovation Team, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xiaoyue ShiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Poultry Nutrition and Feed Technology Innovation Team, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Qinghe CaiHonest Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201606, China.
Yinuo ZhaoHonest Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201606, China.
Shimeng HuangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Poultry Nutrition and Feed Technology Innovation Team, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Qiugang MaState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Poultry Nutrition and Feed Technology Innovation Team, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Cheng JiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Poultry Nutrition and Feed Technology Innovation Team, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Lihong ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Poultry Nutrition and Feed Technology Innovation Team, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The abrupt transition in feed composition and form during the starter (d 0 to 10) to grower (d 11 to 21) phase can damage intestinal barriers and affect broiler performance, triggering the feed change stress. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of feed change stress and investigate the effect and mechanism of wheat oligopeptides (WOP) on the intestinal damage induced by feed change stress in broilers. A total of 120 one-d-old male Arbor Acre broilers (initial body weight [BW] 45.38 ± 0.64 g) were randomly allocated to two treatments (feed change or not) with 6 replicates of 10 birds, with monitoring for 60 h after changing feeds on d 11. A total of 240 one-d-old male Arbor Acre broilers (initial BW 45.33 ± 0.55 g) were randomly allocated to four treatments supplemented with graded levels of WOP (0.0, 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3%) with 6 replicates of 10 birds. The experimental period was 42 d. Compared with the no feed change (FC) group, broilers exhibited decreased feed intake after 4 h of changing feeds (

Indexed as

BroilerFeed change stressIntestinal stem cellWheat oligopeptidesWnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

Identifiers

PMID42729218
PMCPMC13561957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.