ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Measuring health literacy among older inpatients after elective surgery: evaluation of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire-short form (HLS-EU-Q16).
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Health literacy (HL) has been recognized as a central construct in healthcare that contributes to individual health and serves as a predictor of various health outcomes. Recently, vulnerable groups such as older adults have increasingly become the focus of studies examining HL. In this context, various questionnaires have been developed and deployed, including the widely used European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) and its short form (HLS-EU-Q16). However, it remains unclear whether results from population- and community-based studies can be applied to specific inpatient populations. Furthermore, research focusing on HL among older patients is limited. The aim of this study was therefore to examine distributions of HL across different characteristics and its associations with other health variables and to assess the psychometric properties of the HLS-EU-Q16 in a sample of older inpatients after elective surgery. Methods: We analyzed a cross-sectional sample of 143 hospital patients aged 65 years or older who underwent elective surgery at a university hospital in northern Germany. Levels of HL, along with various sociodemographic and health-related variables, were examined. Additionally, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine the latent factor structure of the HLS-EU-Q16 in this context. Results: The average age of patients was 73.2 years (SD = 5.8), with 52.4% being male. Nearly half (47.6%) of the sample had difficulties in handling health information (i.e., limited HL). Overall, 13.8, 33.8, 40.0, and 12.3% of patients were classified as having inadequate, problematic, sufficient, and excellent HL, respectively. Patients reported the greatest difficulties with items related to mental health and media on the HLS-EU-Q16. No significant differences in HL levels were observed between age groups, genders, or other sociodemographic variables ( Conclusion: Our findings align with previous research indicating high rates of limited HL among older adults. However, we were unable to confirm the three-factor model of the HLS-EU-Q16, which adds to the mixed findings across different participant groups and contexts of previous studies. Developing or adapting HL questionnaires for clinical purposes may improve their relevance and usability in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.