ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Effects of drought stress on growth, physiology and bioactive compound accumulation in licorice (
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Drought stress is a major environmental factor affecting the growth, physiological processes, and secondary metabolism of licorice ( Methods: This meta-analysis synthesized evidence from multiple studies to evaluate the effects of drought stress on growth, physiology, and bioactive compounds in licorice. Random forest analysis and partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) were further applied to identify influential predictors and potential pathway relationships. Results: Drought significantly inhibited photosynthesis and growth. Net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate decreased by 38.31%, 27.74%, and 36.12%, respectively, while chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and SPAD values decreased by 20.83%, 27.52%, and 20.07%, respectively. Seed germination and shoot fresh weight were also reduced. Osmotic adjustment and antioxidant defenses were activated, with proline, soluble protein, and superoxide dismutase activity increasing by 79.82%, 41.30%, and 12.10%, respectively. However, malondialdehyde content increased by 52.90%, indicating insufficient protection against membrane lipid peroxidation. Bioactive compounds showed component-specific responses: total flavonoids increased by 14.97%, glycyrrhizic acid showed no significant overall change, and liquiritin declined in some subgroups. Drought intensity and soil water content were important predictors across physiological response categories, whereas treatment duration was particularly important for photosynthetic responses and bioactive compound accumulation. Discussion: Overall, licorice responses to drought involved photosynthetic inhibition, osmotic adjustment, antioxidant defense, and secondary metabolic reprogramming. Increases in individual phenolic compounds should not be interpreted as an overall improvement in medicinal quality, particularly when accompanied by photosynthetic inhibition, oxidative damage, and biomass loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.