Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729177›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026

Dual-center development and external validation of machine learning models integrating PSA-derived and peripheral inflammatory markers for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Jing Yang, Qianshi Jiang, Yang Wang, Jiaquan Zhou, Guoping Li, Zuobing Yang, Xiangcheng Zhou, Bin Pu, Fanchang Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jing YangHainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4724-7476
Qianshi JiangHainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.
Yang WangHainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.
Jiaquan ZhouHainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.
Guoping LiHainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.
Zuobing YangHainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.
Xiangcheng ZhouHainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.
Bin PuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Fanchang ZengHainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has limited specificity for prostate cancer (PCa), particularly within the PSA gray zone (4-10 ng/mL), where benign and malignant conditions overlap. This study aimed to develop and evaluate logistic regression, decision tree, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models that combine PSA-derived variables with routinely available peripheral inflammatory markers, with a prespecified subgroup analysis of patients in the PSA gray zone. Methods: This retrospective dual-center study consecutively enrolled 317 newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients at Hainan General Hospital between January 2019 and December 2024, including 151 patients with PCa and 166 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The PSA gray-zone subgroup comprised 116 patients (46 PCa and 70 BPH). Total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), and routine blood-cell parameters were obtained from the first blood draw after admission and before biopsy, surgery, or anticancer treatment; the free-to-total PSA ratio (f/t PSA ratio), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were calculated. Logistic regression, decision tree, and XGBoost models were developed using stratified 8:2 training/internal-validation splits. A separate cohort of 60 patients (30 PCa and 30 BPH) from a different institution was used for external validation. Direct area under the curve (AUC) comparisons were performed on a common internal-validation set using paired DeLong tests. Results: Among individual indicators, tPSA showed the highest AUC in the overall cohort (0.801), whereas the f/t PSA ratio showed the highest AUC in the gray-zone subgroup (0.683). The decision tree achieved AUCs of 0.903, 0.867, and 0.724 in the training, internal-validation, and external-validation sets, respectively; the corresponding XGBoost AUCs were 0.930, 0.933, and 0.781. On the common internal-validation set used for paired comparison, the AUCs were 0.811 for logistic regression, 0.867 for the decision tree, and 0.851 for XGBoost, with no significant between-model differences after multiple-comparison correction. In the gray-zone subgroup, the decision tree used the f/t PSA ratio as its primary split and had the highest optimism-corrected AUC (0.757), compared with XGBoost (0.649) and logistic regression (0.609). Conclusions: Models combining PSA-derived variables with peripheral inflammatory markers showed potential as complementary tools for PCa risk stratification, also within the PSA gray zone. No multivariable model demonstrated statistically superior discrimination in the paired comparison. The decision tree offered explicit threshold-based rules, but prospective multicenter evaluation and calibration assessment are required before clinical use.

Indexed as

machine learningmonocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR)neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)Prostate cancer (PCa)prostate-specific antigen (PSA)

Identifiers

PMID42729177
PMCPMC13561729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.