ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Combined clinical and DWI radiomics model for predicting 90-day functional outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an interpretable machine learning model based on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) radiomics and D-dimer for 90-day outcome prediction after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), and to explore candidate upstream transcriptional programs of D-dimer using publicly available rat middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) datasets as an exploratory, hypothesis-generating step. Methods: This retrospective study included 115 AIS patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (January 2024-September 2025). Patients were stratified by 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores into favorable (0-2) and unfavorable (1-4) outcome groups. DWI radiomic features were extracted and selected to construct four machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, LDA, LightGBM). Independent clinical risk factors were identified to build a clinical model. The best machine learning model was combined with clinical factors to create a combined model (Combined-LR), interpreted via SHAP. Additionally, transcriptomic analysis of two rat MCAO datasets was conducted to investigate D-dimer-related molecular mechanisms. Results: The Radiomics-LR model showed superior performance (training AUC 0.926, testing AUC 0.857). D-dimer was an independent risk factor. Combined-LR achieved the best performance (training AUC 0.939, testing AUC 0.862; optimism-corrected AUC 0.838 by bootstrap, 0.772 by cross-validation), significantly outperforming the clinical model (training Conclusion: We established an interpretable machine learning model integrating DWI radiomics and clinical variables for predicting 90-day post-thrombolysis outcomes in AIS. Transcriptomic analyses provided hypothesis-generating insights into D-dimer-related mechanisms. External multi-center validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.