SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Experiences of death preparedness among family caregivers of terminal patients: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Death preparedness is an important component of hospice care, yet research focusing on family caregivers of terminally ill patients remains in its early stages, with few studies systematically synthesizing the death preparedness experiences of this group. The study aimed to integrate the experiences of death preparedness among family caregivers of terminally ill patients and provide a reference for developing family-centered supportive care interventions for this population. Methods: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies were conducted. Six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library) were searched for relevant qualitative studies published from database inception to January 31, 2026. We utilized the Australian JBI Quality Assessment Criteria for Qualitative Research to evaluate the quality of the included studies and utilized thematic analysis approach for data analysis. Presentation of this synthesis adhered to the PRISMA guideline. Results: A total of 13 studies were included. Ten new categories were generated and synthesized into four integrated findings, including reconstructing the spiritual meaning of death, information communication for death preparation, coping with multidimensional pressures of reality, and internal and external resources to support caregivers. Conclusion: Death preparedness among family caregivers of terminal patients is a complex and multidimensional psychosocial process. Its complexity and challenges need to be fully assessed and understood through the authentic experiences of family caregivers themselves. This meta-synthesis may help healthcare professionals develop family-centered clinical support measures, thereby promoting the development of hospice care practice and improving the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.