ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Dietary fiber density and incident gross motor limitation among middle-aged and older adults: a prospective cohort analysis.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Preserving physical function is a central goal of ageing research, yet the dietary factors that precede early motor limitation remain incompletely defined. Methods: Here we examined whether dietary fiber density was associated with incident gross motor limitation in the 2013 Health Care and Nutrition Study linked to the Health and Retirement Study. Among 5,388 adults aged 50 years or older who were free of gross motor limitation at baseline, 2,018 developed incident limitation during biennial follow-up through 2022. Results: In the fully adjusted modified Poisson model, each 1-s.d. increment in fiber density was associated with a risk ratio of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.90), and the highest versus lowest quartile had a risk ratio of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.81). Augmented inverse probability weighting estimated a 9.0 percentage-point lower absolute risk in the highest versus lowest quartile. Estimates were unchanged after multiple imputation for missing covariates. In Fine-Gray models treating death as a competing event, the subdistribution hazard ratio was 0.82 per 1-s.d. increment (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.87). Results were also consistent across alternative exposure and outcome definitions, interval-aware models, diet-pattern adjustment and secondary functional outcomes. Conclusion: Higher fiber density was consistently associated with lower functional-limitation risk, but it may index a broader constellation of dietary and lifestyle factors; causal effects cannot be inferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.