SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Uncharted phytochemical frontiers: a systematic review of novel bioactive compounds from underexplored aromatic plants for cancer therapy.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer continues to cause a high degree of morbidity and mortality worldwide, making it essential for new, safer, and more effective therapies to be developed. Aromatic plants provide researchers with diverse secondary metabolites that may have useful pharmacological effects. This systematic review examines several aromatic plants that were used medicinally in the past but have not been examined recently for their potential to produce new bioactive molecules with anticancer activity. Methods: The protocol for this systematic review followed PRISMA 2020, and it aimed to assess the anticancer potential of bioactive compounds obtained from underexplored aromatic plants. Peer-reviewed articles reporting phytochemical isolation, structural characterization, biological evaluation, and mechanistic investigations were systematically retrieved and analyzed. Data on plant species, bioactive compounds, identification methods, cancer models, molecular targets, pharmacological activities, and translational evidence were extracted and synthesized. Results: In this review, a variety of phytochemicals that exhibit strong anticancer effects were identified, including the following: monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, diterpenoids, triterpenoids, flavonoids, steroid compounds and phenylpropanoids. In addition to the existing identified compounds, several new phytochemicals, named epunctanone, PCPT-1, aspiletrein A, paeoniflorigenone, 7,8-epoxynagilactone, compound 5o, and new derivatives of phorbol esters, demonstrated powerful cytotoxic activities in many cancer models. The mechanism by which these phytochemicals exert their anticancer effect has been studied, and several pathways identified including: induction of apoptosis, blockage of cell-cycle progression, modulation of oxidative stress, inhibition of angiogenesis and metastasis, as well as regulation of various critical kinase signaling pathways (e.g. PI3K/Akt/mTOR, MAPK, STAT3, EGFR, NF-κB). Conclusion: Underexplored aromatic plants are a promising source of structurally diverse bioactive compounds with encouraging anticancer activity in preclinical studies. However, there is no convincing evidence from high-quality human clinical trials that essential oils or their constituents can directly treat or cure cancer. Further rigorous preclinical and clinical studies are needed to establish their safety and therapeutic efficacy. Challenges including phytochemical standardization, limited pharmacokinetic and toxicological data, insufficient
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.