ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2026
Preventing late corrections reveals anticipatory motor control.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful interception requires combining predictive planning with continuous sensory feedback, yet these processes are difficult to dissociate because they operate simultaneously throughout movement. Here, we asked how predictive control is expressed when late online corrections are made ineffective but visual information is left intact. Participants performed a visuomotor interception task in which they moved a horizontal cursor to intercept a falling target at its predicted landing position. On selected trials, the cursor became temporarily unresponsive immediately before interception, preventing late motor corrections while leaving the target continuously visible. Manual and gaze behavior were quantified using two complementary root-mean-square error (RMSE) measures that tracked alignment with either the target's instantaneous position or its landing position. Under normal conditions, manual movements converged on the predicted landing position earlier on successful than on unsuccessful trials; trial-averaged gaze showed no comparable effect. Increasing cursor-freeze durations progressively reduced interception accuracy but shifted manual behavior toward earlier alignment with the landing position before the freeze began, indicating a redistribution of control from late feedback corrections toward earlier predictive planning. These findings show that when late online corrections become ineffective, humans compensate by committing earlier to predicted future states. This redistribution was large and consistent in manual behavior, and considerably harder to detect in trial-averaged gaze.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.