ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Acute prefrontal hemodynamic responses to Xingnao Kaiqiao acupuncture in healthy participants and patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives: Xingnao Kaiqiao (XNKQ) acupuncture is used clinically in prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDOC), but the cortical processes underlying its acute effects remain incompletely characterised. We used bedside functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) with a superficial non-acupoint sham comparator to examine acute prefrontal hemodynamic responses in pDOC patients and healthy controls. Methods: Forty-five pDOC patients (25 minimally conscious state; 20 unresponsive wakefulness syndrome) and 127 healthy volunteers were enrolled; 124 healthy volunteers were retained for complete-case analysis. Participants received real XNKQ acupuncture or superficial sham needling at adjacent non-acupoints. fNIRS recorded oxyhaemoglobin (HbO) across three 8-min windows: pre-acupuncture (Before), steady-state needle retention (During), and post-acupuncture (After). Regional HbO was the principal analysis; connectivity-derived network, temporal, and baseline-association analyses were exploratory. Results: In healthy participants, real acupuncture produced greater HbO responses than sham across all four regions and the global prefrontal average (Cohen's Conclusion: Real XNKQ acupuncture was associated with greater acute prefrontal HbO responses than superficial non-acupoint needling. The effect was broad in healthy participants and more restricted in pDOC patients. These findings demonstrate an acute hemodynamic response, not clinical efficacy, preserved awareness, or strict acupoint specificity. Network and baseline association findings remain exploratory. Patient protocol registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2400090915 (registered 15 October 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.