ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Anatomy-guided prediction of complications after hypospadias repair: development and multicenter validation of stratified machine learning models.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prediction of adverse outcomes after hypospadias repair remains difficult because the risk is influenced by penile anatomy and by whether the urethral plate is preserved or transected. We aimed to develop and externally validate stratified machine-learning models for postoperative complications requiring surgical intervention after primary hypospadias repair. Methods: This multicenter cohort study used prospectively collected clinical data from 17 tertiary hospitals in China. The development cohort included 584 boys treated at Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, and the external validation cohort included 511 boys treated at 16 additional centers. Patients were stratified according to urethral plate transection (UPT) status. The outcome was any postoperative complication requiring surgical intervention, including urethrocutaneous fistula, urethral stricture, urethral diverticulum, or recurrent ventral curvature. Candidate predictors included age, penile and glans dimensions, urethral plate width, meatal position, preoperative ventral curvature, degloving/plication variables, and length of deficient urethra. Eight machine-learning algorithms were compared. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for model interpretation, and Streamlit-based calculators were developed. Results: The final modeling cohort included 1,095 boys. UPT was performed in 333 of 584 patients in the development cohort and in 244 of 511 patients in the external validation cohort. In the development cohort, complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 78/251 (31.1%) non-UPT patients and 162/333 (48.6%) UPT patients. In the external validation cohort, the corresponding rates were 64/267 (24.0%) and 118/244 (48.4%). For non-UPT patients, the optimized random forest model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85; global SHAP importance ranked length of deficient urethra, age, glans length, preoperative curvature, glans width, and urethral plate width. For UPT patients, the optimized decision tree model achieved an AUC of 0.84; global SHAP importance ranked age, post-correction meatal position, length of deficient urethra, penile length, glans length, glans width, and preoperative curvature. Conclusions: UPT-stratified machine-learning models provided interpretable estimates of the risk of postoperative complications requiring surgical intervention after primary hypospadias repair. These tools should be used to support risk counseling and follow-up planning, not to replace intraoperative judgment, surgeon experience, or center-specific quality assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.