Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42729009›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2026

HOPE-AO overprescribing in older adults with chronic pain: a protocol for qualitative interviews with patients and healthcare professionals.

Pat Schofield, Stuart G Spicer, Richard Byng, Rupert A Payne, Ian Maidment, Phyo Kyaw Myint, Paul McNamee, Carrie Stewart, Mark Horowitz, Victoria Abbott-Flemming

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pat SchofieldUniversity of Plymouth School of Nursing and Midwifery, Plymouth, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4242-754X
Stuart G SpicerPENARC, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7585-8886
Richard ByngPENARC, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, France.
Rupert A PayneUniversity of Exeter Primary Care Research Group, Exeter, England, UK.
Ian MaidmentAston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4152-9704
Phyo Kyaw MyintUniversity of Aberdeen School of Medicine Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3852-6158
Paul McNameeUniversity of Aberdeen School of Medicine Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
Carrie StewartUniversity of Aberdeen School of Medicine Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
Mark HorowitzNorth East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK.
Victoria Abbott-FlemmingUniversity of Plymouth School of Nursing and Midwifery, Plymouth, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3953-8040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pain in the older population is often poorly identified and subsequently poorly managed. Many myths and misconceptions exist amongst both older adults and healthcare professionals, including fear of using other methods of pain management and failure to monitor the impact of current approaches. This leads to underreporting of pain by the older adult population, overprescribing of pain medication, and failure to monitor the impact of prescribed drugs until major health crises such as falls or other serious complications occur, which can result in hospitalisation. Methods: The aim of this study was to explore chronic pain prescribing in older adults, both in terms of the population itself and in terms of individual perceptions, experiences and overall needs. As such, two work packages were employed, firstly to explore the wider prescribing patterns using the CPRD database (quantitative work package), and secondly to explore individual experiences using qualitative interviews (qualitative work package). The mixed methods methodology included an epidemiological approach along with qualitative methodology and a discrete choice experiment. Ultimately, the final outcomes of this investigation will lead to adopting a codesigned intervention which will be evaluated in a later research programme. This protocol focuses on both the qualitative work package and the wider project, including a brief outline of the quantitative work package. A more detailed technical protocol for the quantitative work package is available in a linked publication.

Indexed as

ageingoverprescribingPain

Identifiers

PMID42729009
PMCPMC13560863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.