ArticleRoyal Society open science2026
Anthropogenic modification shifts pollinator phenology in the eastern USA.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the effects of increasing anthropogenic changes on ecological communities is integral to predicting and mitigating such changes in the future. Insect pollinators are vital to ecosystem health. Quantifying pollinator phenology (i.e. flight period) offers insight into human impacts on ecosystem function, yet research is often constrained to narrow geographic and taxonomic scales. To address these constraints, we conducted a large-scale assessment of pollinator phenology across an anthropogenic modification gradient in the eastern USA using citizen science data from iNaturalist. We integrated 83 012 pollinator observations of 52 species with a remotely sensed layer of human modification to quantify species-specific differences in phenological change. We tested whether anthropogenic modification was a predictor of phenology. Our results reveal both taxonomic and spatial variation across a gradient of anthropogenic modification, with 19 species from three orders experiencing phenological shifts. We found evidence that pollinators in more anthropogenically modified areas of the eastern USA have seasons that start and end later in the year. By leveraging citizen science data, this study expands phenological research and provides a broader assessment across taxonomic and spatial scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.