Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728997›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2025

Potential of terrestrial laser scanning for characterizing forest regeneration: A review and an experimental case study.

Bojana Petrovic, Anna Candotti, Carlotta Grande, Miriam Sophie Faerber, Enrico Tomelleri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bojana PetrovicFaculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9901-3471
Anna CandottiFaculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Carlotta GrandeFaculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Miriam Sophie FaerberFaculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Enrico TomelleriFaculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest regeneration monitoring is essential for evaluating ecosystem recovery and informing sustainable forest management. Optical remote sensing methods such as NDVI and EVI are commonly used for this purpose, but they often fail to capture fine-scale structural information, particularly in early successional stages. Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS), in contrast, offers high-resolution, three-dimensional data capable of directly detecting tree structure, height distribution, and leaf area index (LAI). This study combines a systematic literature review with original TLS data collected from a regenerating forest plot affected by windstorm disturbance, where multispectral imagery was also acquired. The review highlights the advantages of TLS over optical techniques, particularly in detecting understory vegetation and capturing structural complexity. The experimental results support these findings: TLS enabled the accurate detection of tree saplings that were not visible in optical imagery and allowed for the extraction of height distributions and LAI. These results demonstrate that even single TLS acquisition can provide critical structural insights into forest regeneration that optical methods alone cannot deliver. We conclude that TLS is a valuable tool for monitoring post-disturbance recovery and advocates for its integration with optical remote sensing approaches such as NDVI and EVI to achieve a more comprehensive assessment of forest regeneration.

Indexed as

Forest regenerationpost-disturbance recoverySentinel-2Structural Forest metricsTerrestrial laser scanning

Identifiers

PMID42728997
PMCPMC13560847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.