Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728956›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2026

Training resources on open and responsible research and innovation (Open RRI): gaps, quality and opportunities to advance training.

Cristina Lagido, Kristian Nielsen, Gitte Kragh, Pascal Flohr, Louise Bezuidenhout, Loek Brinkman, Agnese Baini, Chiara Saviane, Asya Salnikova, Adam Brandstetter-Kunc and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Cristina LagidoAarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kristian NielsenAarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6192-400X
Gitte KraghAarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Pascal FlohrData Archiving and Networked Services, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3203-913X
Louise BezuidenhoutLeiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Loek BrinkmanData Archiving and Networked Services, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Agnese BainiSISSA - Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Trieste, Italy.
Chiara SavianeSISSA - Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Trieste, Italy.
Asya SalnikovaEuropean Science Foundation, Strasbourg, France.
Adam Brandstetter-KuncEuropean Science Foundation, Strasbourg, France.
Giacomo ConsoliniUniversita Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Antónia CorreiaUniversidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6610-8853
Paula MouraUniversidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Maya FedeliUniversita Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Jonathan EnglandOpenAIRE, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6715-8628
Shanmugasundaram VenkataramanOpenAIRE, Athens, Greece.
Aslak SkarvøyEARMA - European Association of Research Managers and Administrators, Brussels, Belgium.
Teodora KonachEARMA - European Association of Research Managers and Administrators, Brussels, Belgium.
Borana TarajEARMA - European Association of Research Managers and Administrators, Brussels, Belgium.
Katharina KollerZSI - Zentrum für Soziale Innovation, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-3297
Ilse MarschalekZSI - Zentrum für Soziale Innovation, Vienna, Austria.
Maria SchrammelZSI - Zentrum für Soziale Innovation, Vienna, Austria.
Sanja JurkovicRuđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Bojan MacanRuđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Alen VodopijevecRuđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.
Brian CahillSciLink Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7325-5114
Andrea Giraldo SevillaLPI - Learning Planet Institute, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2218-5569
Nico PitrelliSISSA - Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Trieste, Italy.
Alessio Livio SperaAPRE - Agenzia della Promozione della Ricerca Europea, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8639-6776
Claudia IasilloAPRE - Agenzia della Promozione della Ricerca Europea, Rome, Italy.
Pedro PríncipeUniversidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-4196
Noemi De LorenzoUniversita Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Muki HaklayLPI - Learning Planet Institute, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Open Science (OS) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) are increasingly converging under the concept of Open RRI, which integrates openness with inclusivity, responsibility, and societal engagement. Strengthening researcher skills in this area requires a clear understanding of existing training provision. This study presents findings from the Horizon Europe project PATTERN, which mapped and assessed Open RRI training resources across Europe. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was applied, combining desk research, surveys, semi-structured interviews, data workshops, and mutual learning events. In total, 571 training resources were identified and analysed across eight skill areas: Open Access; FAIR Data; Citizen Science; Research Integrity; Gender, Non-discrimination, and Inclusion; Dissemination and Exploitation; Science Communication; and Management and Leadership. A subset of resources was further evaluated using defined quality criteria. Results: The mapping reveals a fragmented and uneven training landscape, with a strong predominance of introductory-level resources and limited provision for intermediate and advanced learners. Training is often generic and lacks contextualisation, with gaps in inclusivity, multilingual provision, and local adaptation. Quality assessment highlights strengths such as modular design, open licensing, and the use of active learning approaches. However, recurring challenges include limited accessibility, unclear pathways for reuse, and difficulties in implementation and long-term sustainability. Key thematic gaps include intersectionality, policy engagement, supervision ethics, and the integration of indigenous and local knowledge. Conclusions: Despite growing availability of training resources, significant gaps remain in scope, depth, and inclusivity. Addressing these challenges requires improved coordination, expansion of advanced and context-sensitive training, enhanced multilingual accessibility, and stronger integration into curricula and institutional practices to support sustainable Open RRI capacity building.

Indexed as

Open and Responsible Research and Innovation (Open RRI); Training resources; Open RRI education; Quality assessment; Evaluation Framework; Capacity building

Identifiers

PMID42728956
PMCPMC13560565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.