Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728928›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2025

FXR agonist in post-liver transplantation patients: a randomized open-labeled study. [Protocol].

Anila K N, Saraswathy S Nair, Dinesh Balakrishnan, Unnikrishnan G, Binoj S T, Ramachandran Narayana Menon, Christi Titus Varghese, Shweta Mallick, Krishnanunni Nair, Madhu Srinivasan Durairaj and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anila K NGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2593-9623
Saraswathy S NairGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Dinesh BalakrishnanGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Unnikrishnan GGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Binoj S TGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ramachandran Narayana MenonGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Christi Titus VargheseGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shweta MallickGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Krishnanunni NairGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Madhu Srinivasan DurairajGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4878-7709
Guhan VGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nafiya ZackariahGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Haritha RajakrishnanGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arun ValsanHepatology, Division of Gastromedicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8410-9665
Johns Shaji MathewDepartment of Multiorgan transplant and HPB Surgery, Burjeel Hospital, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Cyriac Abby PhilipsDepartment of Clinical and Translational Hepatology, The Liver Institute, Rajagiri Hospital, Aluva, Kerala, India.
Christopher WatsonAddenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 OQQ, UK.
Sudheer O VGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sudhindran SGI Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Kochi, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9947-2678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver diseases cause nearly 2 million deaths worldwide each year, with approximately 1 million deaths from cirrhosis complications and another 1 million from viral hepatitis and liver cancer, according to WHO estimates. Liver transplantation (LT) remains the primary curative option, boasting success rates of 85% in the first year and 75% at five years post-transplant. Despite high costs, LT is considered cost-effective, especially for younger patients with active work years remaining. However, post-transplant complications, particularly intrahepatic cholestasis, present notable challenges. This complication arises from factors such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, infections, immunological rejection, and surgical complications, all contributing to impaired bile flow and liver damage. Current medical therapies for post-LT cholestasis are limited, with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) frequently used, despite questionable efficacy. Obeticholic acid (OCA), a potent Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) agonist approved by the FDA for treating primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), has shown potential benefits in reducing elevated cholestatic liver enzymes. Given its significant effects on liver health, OCA may offer therapeutic value in managing post-transplant cholestasis and improving graft survival. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate OCA's efficacy compared to UDCA in reducing cholestatic injury and enhancing graft function post-LT. The primary outcomes will focus on a 15% reduction in alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels at 3, 6, and 12 months from baseline one month. Secondary outcomes include molecular markers, biliary complications, graft rejection, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Results are anticipated to demonstrate that OCA could ameliorate cholestasis, improve graft survival, reduce post-transplant complications, and enhance quality of life, potentially setting a new standard in post-LT care if found beneficial.

Indexed as

Chenodeoxycholic AcidLiver TransplantationPostoperative ComplicationsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearCholestasisHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptor, Farnesoid X-ActivatedChenodeoxycholic Acidobeticholic acidReceptor, Farnesoid X-ActivatedReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclearalkaline phosphatase.cholestasisLiver transplantationobeticholic acidursodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID42728928
PMCPMC13560005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.