ArticleNucleic acids research2026
UFold-X: an enhanced Dual & Dynamic U-Mamba model for long-range RNA secondary structure prediction.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA secondary structure is essential for understanding the functions of non-coding RNAs, ribosomal RNAs, and viral genomes. However, accurate prediction of long RNA structures remains challenging due to complex long-range interactions and the limited availability of long-RNA training data. We present UFold-X, a dual-branch deep learning framework that combines a convolutional encoder for local structure modeling with a Mamba-based Visual State Space Module for capturing long-range dependencies. A dynamic gating mechanism adaptively integrates the two branches according to sequence length. UFold-X was evaluated on multiple benchmark datasets containing RNAs up to 5000 nucleotides. To rigorously assess generalization, we introduced a cross-clan benchmark for long RNAs. Under this stringent setting, UFold-X achieved performance comparable to state-of-the-art classical approaches while achieving the best performance among deep learning-based methods. Additional cross-family and within-family evaluations further demonstrated robust transferability and competitive predictive performance. UFold-X also maintained excellent computational efficiency, requiring only 0.08 s per sequence on average. To assess biological consistency, we developed a SHAPE-based reactivity prediction variant (UFold-X-R) and an integrated metric, the Hybrid Reactivity-Pairing Score (HRPS). UFold-X-R showed strong agreement with experimental icSHAPE data and achieved the highest HRPS among all evaluated methods. A user-friendly web server is available at https://ufold-x.ai4bread.com.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.