ArticleBMC health services research2026
Perceived benefits, barriers, and health system consequences of introducing new models of online sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection testing in Ontario, Canada.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternet-based testing services for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections have increased in prevalence and altered the testing landscape and testing behaviours in many jurisdictions. Our objective was to understand how system partners perceived the possible benefits and drawbacks of adapting and implementing an online testing program like GetCheckedOnline which was already operating in British Columbia, Canada, into a new provincial context where it did not exist.
methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews and focus groups with sexual healthcare providers, program managers and developers, and other public health professionals with expertise in sexually transmitted infections testing (N = 41) in Ontario, Canada. Our interview questions were part of a larger study focused on improving equitable access to sexually transmitted infections testing. Transcripts were transcribed verbatim and analysed using NVivo software following grounded theory.
resultsWe created a conceptual figure to chart tensions from participant accounts onto a model of GetCheckedOnline. We describe five key tensions in the accounts of our participants to elucidate perspectives on the possible benefits and barriers/concerns of implementing a digital testing model like GetCheckedOnline in another province: (1) access, (2) privacy, (3) co-ordination/communication, (4) agency, and (5) health system impacts. We map these five tensions across the core elements of the online testing program (i.e., from creating an online account, completing an assessment, and submitting specimens to getting results and engaging in repeat testing).
conclusionOur analysis elucidates the multiple advantages that online testing modalities may provide for service users as well as substantive barriers and concerns perceived by health system partners, including the potential (unintended) consequences and paradoxes of introducing digital sexually transmitted infections testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.