ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Clinical evaluation of multiplex pathogen real-time PCR for early detection of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes in intra-abdominal infections.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid pathogen identification is essential for the management of post-operative intra-abdominal infections. However, conventional culture is often time-consuming and has limited pathogen coverage. Our study aimed to evaluate the performance of multiplex pathogen real-time polymerase chain reaction (MP-PCR) in detecting pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) from postoperative drainage fluids. A total of 63 drainage fluid specimens were prospectively collected from 52 patients who underwent abdominal surgery and were included in the final analysis. All specimens were detected in parallel using conventional culture and MP-PCR, and a set of specimens were further validated via targeted next-generation sequencing(tNGS). MP-PCR yielded significantly higher positive detection rates than conventional culture at both the patient level (73.1% vs. 57.7%) and specimen level (76.2% vs. 61.9%). Pathogen spectrum analysis revealed that bacteria constituted the predominant pathogens identified by both methods, whereas MP-PCR exhibited a broader pathogen spectrum. MP-PCR showed higher frequencies for major clinically relevant bacteria associated with intra-abdominal infections and demonstrated substantial consistency with conventional culture results. Additionally, the identification of ARGs (mainly AmpC and KPC) shown excellent consistence with antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST). Furthermore, tNGS further validated the reliability of MP-PCR-based pathogen identification. In conclusion, these findings suggested that MP-PCR serves as a robust and complementary molecular tool for the early detection of pathogens and ARGs in postoperative drainage fluids, holding great potential to optimize the diagnosis and targeted treatment of postoperative intra-abdominal infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42728533What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.