Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728527›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2026

Real-World Evidence of Upadacitinib in Atopic Dermatitis after Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Dupilumab: The CAN UpTIMISE Study.

Vimal H Prajapati, Vipul Jain, Melinda J Gooderham, Michael Cecchini, Jason K Lee, Charles W Lynde, Parbeer Grewal, Andrew Ferrier, David Préfontaine, Carly Sterling and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05394792 (CANadian Effectiveness of UPadacitinib in Adult Moderate-to-severe aTopIc derMatitis Patients Who Are Inadequate Responders to Dupilumab or diScontinuing Dupilumab Due to safEty/Tolerability Reasons), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05394792 completednot on this map

CANadian Effectiveness of UPadacitinib in Adult Moderate-to-severe aTopIc derMatitis Patients Who Are Inadequate Responders to Dupilumab or diScontinuing Dupilumab Due to safEty/Tolerability Reasons: The CAN UpTIMISE Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAbbVieRan2022 to 2024Enrolled111ConditionsAtopic Dermatitis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vimal H PrajapatiDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. vimal@dermatologyresearch.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8315-2522
Vipul JainProbity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Melinda J GooderhamProbity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8926-0113
Michael CecchiniYork Dermatology Clinic & Research Centre, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3468-8865
Jason K LeeEvidence Based Medical Educator Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
Charles W LyndeProbity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9163-5463
Parbeer GrewalFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9296-5851
Andrew FerrierProbity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
David PréfontaineAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8568-0775
Carly SterlingAbbVie Corporation, Saint-Laurent, QC, Canada.
H Chih-Ho HongProbity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9963-8319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUpadacitinib and dupilumab are both approved treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Some dupilumab-treated patients may experience an inadequate response and/or safety/tolerability issues. Real-world data on the effectiveness of upadacitinib in this population remain limited. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in adults diagnosed with moderate-to-severe AD who were inadequate responders to dupilumab or discontinued dupilumab for safety/tolerability reasons.

methodsCAN UpTIMISE was a Canadian prospective, observational study in adults treated with dupilumab for moderate-to-severe AD with a decision to switch to upadacitinib (15/30 mg), per local label. Effectiveness was assessed over 4 months using the validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD), facial IGA, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Patient Oriented Eczema Measurement (POEM). Results are presented using descriptive statistics.

resultsAmong 108 patients (94.4% with vIGA-AD ≥ 2), 83.3% discontinued dupilumab due to inadequate effectiveness and 16.7% discontinued due to safety/tolerability reasons. At month 4, 65.9% (95% CI 55.1-75.2) achieved vIGA-AD 0/1 by observed case analysis (primary outcome), with improvements evident as early as month 1. At month 4 after upadacitinib initiation, 90.2%, 82.9%, and 52.4% of patients achieved EASI ≤ 7, ≤ 3, and ≤ 1, respectively; 70.5% with baseline WP-NRS > 4 had ≥ 4-point reduction and 46.7% reported WP-NRS 0/1. DLQI and POEM scores improved similarly, with 36.0% and 34.3%, respectively, achieving scores indicating no impact or clear/almost clear disease. Minimal disease activity (EASI ≤3 and WP-NRS 0/1) was reached by 43.8% of patients. Upadacitinib was generally well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified.

conclusionsUpadacitinib provided rapid, clinically meaningful, and generally sustained improvements in disease activity, itch, and quality of life, supporting its role as an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with inadequate response or intolerance to dupilumab in real-world practice. Graphical abstract available for this article.

trial registrationNCT05394792.

Indexed as

Atopic dermatitisDupilumabJanus kinase inhibitorsObservational studyReal-world effectivenessUpadacitinib

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.