Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728525›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2026

Management of Early Pregnancy Loss: Reproductive Outcome in Subsequent Euploid Embryo Transfers.

Emily A Clarke, Sarah C Roger, Raina Kishan, Morgan Baird, Joseph A Lee, Eric Flisser, Tanmoy Mukherjee, Alan B Copperman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily A ClarkeIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA. emilyclarkemd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-3590
Sarah C RogerIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA.
Raina KishanIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA.
Morgan BairdReproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Joseph A LeeReproductive Medicine Associates of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Eric FlisserIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA.
Tanmoy MukherjeeIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA.
Alan B CoppermanIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early pregnancy loss (EPL) is commonly managed with medical or surgical intervention, with comparable outcomes described in the general population. However, intrauterine instrumentation including dilation and curettage has been linked to endometrial thinning, associated with inferior in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. Limited data exists on how EPL management influences subsequent IVF outcomes, particular in patients undergoing single euploid embryo transfer (SEET). This single-center, retrospective cohort study compared endometrial thickness and outcomes in the subsequent SEET cycle between patients with EPL who underwent either medical or surgical management. A total of 203 patients were included: 88 patients who underwent medical and 115 who underwent surgical management. The primary outcome was change in endometrial thickness between the initial and subsequent SEET cycle. Secondary outcomes included SEET cycle cancellation due to thin endometrium (< 7 mm) and subsequent SEET outcomes. Between the initial and subsequent SEET cycle, change in endometrial thickness was similar between groups (Medical + 0.3 ± 1.4 mm, Surgical + 0.1 ± 1.5 mm; P = 0.65). Endometrial thickness in the subsequent cycle was also comparable (Medical 9.4 ± 1.5 mm, Surgical 9.1 ± 1.2 mm; P = 0.20). SEET cycle cancellation due to thin endometrium was low and similar between groups (Medical 3.4% [95% CI 1.0-9.6] (n = 3), Surgical 2.6% [95% CI 1.0-7.4] (n = 3); P = 0.74). While surgical management was associated with higher subsequent clinical pregnancy loss (15.7% vs. 4.9%; P < 0.05; aOR 3.72 [95% CI 1.11-12.47]), subsequent live birth rates were similar between groups (Medical 48.8%, Surgical 40.7%; P = 0.27; aOR 0.67 [95% CI 0.35-1.28]). These findings may help guide counseling patients undergoing IVF regarding management decision-making when facing EPL.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousEmbryo TransferEndometriumAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDilation and curettageEarly pregnancy lossEndometriumEuploid transferMisoprostol

Identifiers

PMID42728525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.