ArticleThe AAPS journal2026
Engineering and Characterisation of 3D-Printed Timolol Maleate Implants for Long-Acting Glaucoma Treatment.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timolol maleate (TM) is a nonselective β-blocker commonly used to treat ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Traditional formulations, such as eye drops and gel-forming solutions, often require frequent administration and may lead to systemic side effects and poor patient compliance. To address these challenges, this study investigated the fabrication and characterization of TM-loaded ocular implants via vat-polymerization 3D printing. The implants were fabricated using polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) alone or in combination with polylactic acid/polyurethane acrylate (PLA/PUA) or poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA). The implants were characterized for their thermal properties, drug-release profiles, and biocompatibility. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy confirmed the absence of significant chemical interactions between the TM and the polymers. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed the thermal stability of the TM-loaded implants, with drug loading influencing the thermal properties. In vitro release studies over 180 days showed that drug release was proportional to the surface area-to-volume (SA/V) ratio of the implant. The release kinetics followed a diffusion-controlled mechanism, as described by the Korsmeyer-Peppas model. The biocompatibility study showed no significant cytotoxicity, with fibroblast viability exceeding 80%. These findings suggest that TM-loaded implants could provide a more effective, sustained-release alternative for glaucoma treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42728498What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.