Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728479›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Peace From on High? How Religion Moderates the Stress of Higher Status American Workers.

Rachael Murdock, Laura Upenieks, Scott Schieman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachael MurdockDepartment of Sociology, Baylor University, 97326 One Bear Place, Waco, TX, 76798, USA.
Laura UpenieksDepartment of Sociology, Baylor University, 97326 One Bear Place, Waco, TX, 76798, USA. laura_upenieks@baylor.edu.
Scott SchiemanDepartment of Sociology, University of Toronto, Unit 17100, 17th Floor, Ontario Power Building, 700 University Ave., Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building on the stress process model, this study examines whether religiosity moderates the mental health consequences of higher-status work among American workers. Drawing on the stress of higher status (SHS) framework and job demands-resources (JD-R) theory, we analyze data from the 2023 Measuring Employment Sentiments and Social Inequality survey (MESSI; N = 1744), a nationally representative survey of American workers. We focus on three work-related stressors central to the stress of higher status-job authority, long work hours, and work-family conflict-and three dimensions of religion/spirituality: prayer, religious service attendance, and beliefs in divine control. Regression results show that divine control operates as a domain-specific moderator. It buffers the positive association between work-family conflict and psychological distress but shows a stress-exacerbation pattern in contexts of high job authority. In contrast, prayer and attendance exhibit modest main effects with psychological distress but do not significantly moderate stressor-distress associations. No patterns of moderation emerge for long work hours. Taken together, our findings highlight religion as a multidimensional and status-contingent resource, underscoring the importance of matching specific religious dimensions to particular stress processes in shaping mental health. We also propose several future directions to integrate religion with research on work and mental health within the SHS framework.

Indexed as

Divine controlJob authorityPsychological distressReligiosityStress of higher statusStress process modelWork–family conflict

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.