Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728478›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Religious Literacy as a Clinical Competency in Clinical Pastoral Education in the USA: Reframing Hospital Chaplaincy Formation for Pluralistic Healthcare.

Jose Freddy Miranda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jose Freddy MirandaSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. jmiranda606@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1610-5015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE) has long shaped hospital chaplaincy through supervised clinical practice, pastoral reflection, self-awareness, and formation in the use of self. These strengths remain essential, but religious diversity in the USA increasingly requires chaplains to navigate beliefs, rituals, family systems, and moral frameworks that can affect medical decision-making. Using a theoretical and conceptual synthesis of interdisciplinary literature from chaplaincy studies, religion and health, palliative care, and religious literacy scholarship, this article examines the USA healthcare context and argues that religious literacy should be treated as a formal clinical competency within CPE rather than as an informal supplement to pastoral presence. Religious literacy is framed not as memorization of facts about world religions but as the capacity to recognize traditions as internally diverse, historically changing, culturally embedded, and clinically consequential. The synthesis identifies five competency domains: tradition-sensitive knowledge, critical self-awareness, patient-centered inquiry, consultation, and interprofessional communication. Integrating these domains into didactics, verbatims, supervision, community consultation, and assessment may strengthen ethical, accurate, and patient-centered spiritual care in pluralistic healthcare environments.

Indexed as

Clinical pastoral educationHospital chaplaincyReligion and healthReligious diversityReligious literacySpiritual care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.