ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Concentration-dependent stimulatory and inhibitory effects of β-cyclocitral, longifolene, and β-ionone on Microcystis aeruginosa.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cyanobacterial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are well-known allelochemicals that inhibit competitors, but their specific roles within the emitting populations remain poorly understood. To uncover the effects of cyanobacterial VOCs on themselves, we investigated the cell growth, photosynthetic characteristics and gene expression in Microcystis aeruginosa in exposure to three main cyanobacterial VOCs (β-cyclocitral, longifolene, and β-ionone) under environment-relevant concentration (0.03-0.12 mM). M. aeruginosa growth was inhibited by 0.12 mM longifolene and 0.09 and 0.12 mM β-ionone, but promoted by other treatments (except of 0.12 mM β-cyclocitral), with the promotion gradually enhancing with lowering the concentration. In the growth-inhibition treatments, a remarkable burst was found in the reactive oxygen species, which might cause oxidative damage to the cells. The treatments with 0.12 mM longifolene and 0.09 and 0.12 mM β-ionone lowered the chlorophyll content and photosynthetic abilities, which might be caused by the down-regulation of associated genes. However, other treatments showed opposing effects. In addition, the treatment with 0.03 mM β-ionone elevated expression of the genes involved in growth as well as the related biological processes and cellular component formation, which might also contribute to the cell growth. However, 0.12 mM β-ionone showed opposing impacts. It can be speculated that cyanobacterial VOCs have dual effects on themselves, which depend on the concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42728474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.