Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728461›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Identification of high-impact chronic pain among cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale framework.

Julie Roed Jespersen, Henrik Bjarke Vaegter, Caroline Matilde Elnegaard, Lene Jarlbaek

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie Roed JespersenPain Research Group, Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. julie.jespersen@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1610-3352
Henrik Bjarke VaegterPain Research Group, Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-9947
Caroline Matilde ElnegaardThe Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care (REHPA), Odense University Hospital, Nyborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6255-9457
Lene JarlbaekDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8702-6788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChronic cancer-related pain is a prevalent and often under-recognized issue among individuals living with or after cancer. Clinically useful tools are needed to classify pain severity and impact and to identify those requiring targeted support. This study applied the Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised (GCPS-R) in a cohort of cancer survivors and examined differences in pain characteristics and psychosocial factors across GCPS-R subgroups. Secondly, the study compared pain characteristics in cancer survivors with high-impact chronic pain (HICP) to an age- and sex-matched sample of patients with non-cancer HICP.

methodsPatients attending a residential cancer rehabilitation course completed a screening questionnaire and a pain-specific module including the GCPS-R and validated measures of disability, psychological distress, pain catastrophizing, and self-rated health. Cancer survivors with HICP were matched 1:3 to patients with non-cancer HICP using registry data collected prior to their initial consultation at an interdisciplinary Pain Center.

resultsAmong 270 cancer survivors included in the analysis, 61% were classified as having HICP. Increasing GCPS-R impact levels were associated with greater pain intensity and disability, higher psychological distress and pain catastrophizing, and poorer self-rated health and quality of life (p < 0.05). Compared with matched non-cancer patients with HICP, cancer survivors reported lower pain intensity and catastrophizing but were at least as likely to meet criteria for widespread pain.

conclusionHICP is present among cancer survivors seeking rehabilitation. The GCPS-R can differentiate clinically meaningful subgroups and may support systematic assessment of pain severity and impact to identify patients requiring targeted support.

Indexed as

Cancer PainCancer SurvivorsChronic PainPain MeasurementAdultAgedCatastrophizationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological DistressSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer survivorsChronic painHigh-impact painInterdisciplinary carePain classificationRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42728461
PMCPMC13569589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.