ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Return to work in elderly population with cancer.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs survival following cancer diagnosis continues to improve, supporting functional recovery and social participation among older cancer survivors has become an important public health priority. This retrospective cohort study examined return-to-work (RTW) trajectories among older cancer survivors and explored the association between RTW and long-term survival.
methodsOlder workers diagnosed with cancer between 2004 and 2015 were identified from nationwide population-based databases in Taiwan. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine sociodemographic, clinical, and work-related factors associated with RTW. Survival differences between survivors with and without RTW were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses.
resultsOlder age, male sex, selected comorbidities, receipt of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, higher income, and engagement in physically demanding occupations were associated with a lower cause-specific hazard of RTW during follow-up. Survivors diagnosed at earlier cancer stages and those with colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer had a higher cause-specific hazard of RTW compared with the corresponding reference groups. Survival differed significantly between survivors with and without RTW across all cancer stages, with more pronounced separation of the survival curves among those with stage III or IV disease. RTW was independently associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality.
conclusionsRTW among older cancer survivors reflects both clinical recovery and broader social reintegration. Survivors who returned to work experienced more favorable survival outcomes, highlighting the importance of supportive, survivorship-focused interventions that facilitate sustained work participation among older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42728454What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.