ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Six-factor-based stratification system for enfortumab vedotin monotherapy in pre-treated patients with metastatic or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
57 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to identify prognostic factors and develop a prognostic stratification system for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/m UC) treated with enfortumab vedotin (EV).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 387 patients with la/m UC who received EV monotherapy and evaluated the prognostic factors using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. We then used the significant factors to derive a system for predicting prognosis.
resultsThe median PFS and OS were 7.6 and 14.6 months, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed six significant factors common to both PFS and OS: poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (≥ 1), presence of aberrant histology (histological subtypes or divergent differentiation), presence of bone metastasis, anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL), high C-reactive protein levels (> 0.5 mg/dL), and hypercalcemia (corrected calcium > 10.2 mg/dL). Based on the number of positive factors, patients were categorized into three groups: 147 patients with none or one factor (low-risk group), 92 patients with two factors (intermediate-risk group), and 148 patients with three or more factors (high-risk group). The log-rank test indicated significant differences in both PFS and OS among the three groups, with C-indices of 0.634 and 0.700 for PFS and OS, respectively.
conclusionsSix factors were identified as common prognostic factors for both PFS and OS in la/m UC patients receiving EV monotherapy. The newly developed prognostic risk stratification system based on these factors is clinically useful, particularly for predicting OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.