ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Pars defect detection with 3 T GE ZeroTE bone MRI in children, adolescents and young adults with low back pain: a pilot study of inter-rater reproducibility and CT-linked feasibility.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate 3 T zero echo time bone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pars-defect assessment in children, adolescents, and young-adults with low back pain, emphasizing inter-rater reproducibility and computed tomography (CT)-linked feasibility. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this single-center retrospective pilot reader study, 40 lumbar MRI examinations (median age, 15.0 years; interquartile range, 13.0-18.3) with zero echo time imaging and sagittal short tau inversion recovery imaging were independently reviewed by two radiologists. Across 480 pars units observations, readers scored pars defects and marrow edema as present or absent. Agreement was summarized using observed agreement, Gwet coefficient 1, and Cohen κ. A CT-linked subset of 11 CT-MRI examinations within 14 days (132 pars units, 14 CT-positive) was analyzed using consensus CT annotations as the reference standard.
resultsFor zero echo time pars-defect detection, observed agreement was 0.983, Gwet coefficient 1 was 0.981 (95% confidence interval, 0.967-0.993), and Cohen κ was 0.853 (95% confidence interval, 0.728-0.949). For short tau inversion recovery edema, values were 0.973, 0.970 (95% confidence interval, 0.949-0.987), and 0.731 (95% confidence interval, 0.558-0.878). In the CT-linked subset, sensitivity/specificity for zero echo time were 71.4%/100.0% for Reader 1 and 85.7%/99.2% for Reader 2; combined assessment increased sensitivity to 85.7% and 92.9% while maintaining high specificity.
conclusion3 T zero echo time MRI showed high inter-rater reproducibility for pars-defect detection. In a small CT-linked subset, specificity was high and sensitivity moderate to high, with a further increase under exploratory combined assessment; these CT-linked estimates are preliminary given the limited number of CT-positive pars. These findings suggest that zero echo time may serve as a reproducible, radiation-sparing adjunct to lumbar MRI rather than a replacement for CT, and require confirmation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42728397What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.