ArticleNature medicine2026
Teclistamab versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 2 trial.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teclistamab, a B cell maturation antigen-targeting bispecific antibody, has demonstrated substantial activity in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), particularly in earlier lines of therapy, and may have higher efficacy in high-risk smoldering MM (HR-SMM) with a more functional immune system. In the randomized phase 2 ImmunoPRISM trial, we compared fixed-duration teclistamab with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in HR-SMM. After a six-patient safety run-in, patients were randomized 2:1 to teclistamab or Rd. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate. As of 26 May 2026, 59 patients were treated-45 received teclistamab and 14 received Rd. Teclistamab treatment induced a CR in 77.8% patients versus 0% with Rd, and minimal residual disease negativity at 10
Identifiers
42728379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.