Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728371›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2026

Visual features explain dynamic aesthetic experiences across distinct movie content.

Mustafa Alperen Ekinci, Nina Buhlmann, Daniel Kaiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mustafa Alperen EkinciNeural Computation Group, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany. alppekinci@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5286-7755
Nina BuhlmannNeural Computation Group, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Daniel KaiserNeural Computation Group, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9007-3160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aesthetic experiences in everyday life unfold under continuously changing visual input. Although these experiences clearly depend on the observer and context, they are partly explained by the visual features of the input. Here, we investigated how well a combination of visual features predicts dynamic aesthetic experiences during naturalistic and artistic movie watching. In two experiments, participants continuously rated the aesthetic appeal of either the nature documentary Home (N = 37) or the animated art-style movie Loving Vincent (N = 30). We modeled moment-to-moment ratings using image-computable visual features extracted from each movie frame, including visual fluency, color and motion statistics, and symmetry. Linear models trained on these features reliably predicted aesthetic ratings for new movie parts, both within and across observers, pointing to shared perceptual influences on aesthetic experiences. Model comparisons showed that visual fluency and color-related features were most informative for predicting aesthetic experience in both movies. Critically, models trained on one movie could reliably predict aesthetic appeal ratings in the other movie, despite the movies' remarkably different content and styles. Color features were most informative for cross-movie prediction. We conclude that visual features provide a robust basis for explaining dynamic aesthetic experiences across observers and different movie content.

Identifiers

PMID42728371
PMCPMC13569840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.