ArticleScientific reports2026
Sparse frame selection for graph-based deadlift form assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated movement analysis from monocular RGB video can enhance injury prevention and performance assessment in strength training. Yet, existing approaches struggle to accurately evaluate the deadlift-one of the most widely practiced exercises with a high risk of injury when performed incorrectly. Assessing form from monocular RGB video remains challenging due to subtle biomechanical errors, redundant frames, and the computational demands of video analysis. This study introduces a Real-Time framework that integrates the modified Search-Map-Search frame-selection method with graph-based models, trained on a custom dataset that was created, labeled as good or bad form, and annotated by a certified expert for deadlift assessment. By selecting six representative frames per repetition, the proposed frame-selection method reduces redundancy by 89.8% while preserving critical biomechanical information. Benchmark results show that the proposed Temporal Graph Convolutional Network (proposed T-GCN) achieved 89.5% accuracy with high precision and recall; its graph-classification stage ran in 0.4 s, while the full video-to-decision pipeline ran in approximately 0.8 s on a desktop GPU. The lightweight proposed Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Network (proposed ST-GCN) variant, with only 4,514 parameters, achieved comparable performance (85.3% accuracy). These findings demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves competitive accuracy while substantially reducing the number of processed frames and computational cost, enabling practical deployment on commodity RGB hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.