ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
Dense RNA motif modifications enable robust in vivo prime editing and enhance efficiencies of diverse editing systems.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prime editing holds promise for therapeutic applications. However, viral delivery of the prime editor presents challenges for clinical translation due to concerns regarding long-term expression. Meanwhile, systemic delivery using non-viral vectors has been limited by low efficiency, the need for repeated injections and reliance on doses that exceed clinically translatable levels. Here we develop engineered prime editing guide RNAs (pegRNAs) with densely modified RNA motifs and demonstrate their application for efficient in vivo prime editing. By systemically delivering the prime editor in RNA format via a single injection of lipid nanoparticles, we achieved nearly 70% editing efficiency in the bulk mouse liver, indicating successful editing of the majority of hepatocytes. Notably, a single injection at a clinically translatable lipid nanoparticle dose was sufficient to suppress target protein expression in vivo, resulting in a near 80-fold increase in editing efficiency compared with conventional end-modified pegRNAs. Furthermore, incorporating densely modified RNA motifs, including the widely used MS2 motif, proved broadly applicable across various RNA sequences and split RNA-guided genome editing platforms, resulting in up to an 11-fold increase in base editing efficiency. These findings present a generalizable approach for enhancing the therapeutic potential of prime editing and expanding the utility of RNA-based therapeutics.
Identifiers
42728339What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.