Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728298›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2026

AI-informed healthcare pedagogy: a review of the literature and application to pedagogical practice informed by case studies from dental education.

Nilufar Ahmed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nilufar AhmedBristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. n.ahmed@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare continue to grow at a rapid pace. Healthcare education is struggling to effectively integrate the manifold applications and opportunities presented by AI to education. Concerns and fears around negative impacts on student learning and potential for misuse alongside a paucity of guidance has led to a sluggish response across much of healthcare education. This paper offers a short review of the applications of AI in healthcare including clinical dentistry and makes suggestions for bridging the gap between education and practice so that educators can better prepare students for their professional careers. This paper argues that open, reflective classroom discussions around ethical concerns and climate impacts of AI are as important as the positive clinical applications to endow students with the knowledge to make decisions that align with social justice and social accountability. Two widely used assessments in dental and wider healthcare education - reflective assessments and evidence-based practice projects - are explored as case studies to develop an updated, AI-informed approach to teaching. Drawing on pedagogical literature, the author offers suggestions for educators to support thoughtful and ethical integration of AI within a student's learning repertoire so that AI becomes supplementary to, and not a substitute for, learning.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, DentalHumansTeaching

Identifiers

PMID42728298
PMCPMC13569459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.