ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing irrigation scheduling in apple orchards: soil moisture thresholds balance yield, fruit quality, and water use efficiency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water scarcity necessitates efficient irrigation strategies in high-value crops like apple. While regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) is known to influence apple yield and quality, the optimal soil moisture threshold for automated systems in region-specific contexts remains poorly defined. This two-year study (2024-2025) evaluated the effects of four precise, soil moisture-based irrigation thresholds on the yield, fruit quality, and water productivity (WP) of 'Super Chief' apples in the northwestern Himalayas. An automated irrigation system using a Human-Machine Interface (HMI) and calibrated soil moisture sensors maintained Volumetric Water Content (VWC) at four thresholds: 100% (I100, 45% VWC), 80% (I80, 36% VWC), 60% (I60, 27% VWC), and 40% (I40, 18% VWC) of field capacity (θfc). Full irrigation (I100) maximized yield (70.80 t ha⁻¹) and fruit size (165.60 g). Severe deficit (I40) significantly enhanced fruit firmness (9.56 N) and soluble solids content (13.95 °Brix) but at the cost of a 20% yield reduction. Crucially, the I80 treatment achieved a near-optimal yield (66.24 t ha⁻¹) while using 20% less irrigation water than I100, resulting in a 31% higher water productivity (WP). Multi-criteria TOPSIS analysis objectively ranked I80 as the best compromise strategy. For 'Super Chief' apples in the Himalayan region, maintaining soil moisture at 80% θfc via sensor-based automation is the superior strategy, effectively balancing marketable yield, enhanced fruit quality, and water conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.