Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728230›Full record

ArticleEcology2026

Second-order elasticities for ecology and evolution: Unraveling nonlinear fitness responses to perturbations.

Maja Kajin, Shripad Tuljapurkar, Wenyun Zuo, Harman Jaggi, Samuel Gascoigne, Roberto Salguero-Gómez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maja KajinDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9996-5897
Shripad TuljapurkarDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Wenyun ZuoDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Harman JaggiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-4917
Samuel GascoigneDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-1810
Roberto Salguero-GómezDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

European Union MN-0023-481H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 101032484NERC NE/X013766/1The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P1-0184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In ecology and evolutionary biology, understanding the relationship between vital rates (e.g., survival, development, reproduction) and population growth is essential to elucidate how life history strategies are shaped by natural selection. Yet most established demographic methods rely on linear assumptions that rank the importance of vital rates but are insensitive to whether the returns of the population growth rate are diminishing or accelerating. Here, we introduce the second-order elasticities of mean individual fitness in the population, the S-elasticity. The S-elasticity is a proportional, element-wise measure that can quantify the curvature of mean individual fitness with respect to single matrix population model (MPM) elements (self S-elasticity) and to pairs of elements (mixed S-elasticity). S-elasticities (1) classify concavity versus convexity of local fitness surfaces, (2) provide a relative-curvature diagnostic by scaling second-order to first-order effects, (3) sum to zero across elements-facilitating comparisons across populations and species-and (4) connect fitness curvature to biologically feasible trade-offs via the elasticity ratio K. We provide a simple inequality based on the S-elasticities and the K-ratio that detects local fitness peaks along constraint directions corresponding to each pair of matrix elements. We illustrate the framework with an average 4 × 4 MPM for Didelphis aurita (Marsupialia, Didelphidae) and compare our results to classical second-order derivatives of population growth rate applied to the same dataset. First-order elasticities identify survival of weaned and subadult survival as dominant linear levers of fitness; their negative self S-elasticities reveal diminishing returns for increases and amplified losses for decreases relative to linear expectations. Mixed S-elasticities expose a costly trade-off between survival of weaned and aged females' fertility: The curvature-only surface is concave near the baseline and the trade-off direction is a local peak, whereas several other element pairs lie along flatter, more substitutable directions. Together, S-elasticities provide a compact diagnostic for when linear rankings suffice, when nonlinearity dominates, and where feasible substitutions are most constrained. Because they are proportional, additive (sum-to-zero), and rooted in life cycle pathways, S-elasticities complement classic elasticity and make second-order demographic information directly comparable across systems-yielding actionable guidance for evolutionary inference and for prioritizing management actions under realistic trade-offs.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic FitnessModels, BiologicalAnimalsdiminishing or accelerating returnselasticitylife history evolutionmarginal rate of substitutionmean individual fitnesssecond‐order derivativetrade‐offtransient‐response matrix

Identifiers

PMID42728230
PMCPMC13569468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.