ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Naturalistic fMRI Language Mapping With Rotation Forest.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Naturalistic fMRI offers a patient-friendly alternative to task-based language mapping but presents analytical challenges due to complex brain responses. This study presents an automated framework for language mapping using naturalistic fMRI analysed with a Rotation Forest (RotF) classifier. Participants were presented a televised quiz show during fMRI acquisition and completed seven task-based language paradigms, which were used as reference maps. RotF models were trained on voxel-wise time series labelled using task-based activation maps and evaluated on independent participants. Performance was assessed using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and the language lateralisation indices (LI). RotF generated activation maps demonstrated strong spatial and lateralisation agreement with task-based activation, capturing both receptive and expressive language regions. Data quality, which was assessed through head motion and post-scan questionnaire score, influenced model performance and provided a practical quality control measure. Feature selection identified a short, informative stimulus segment, enabling reliable language mapping with a scan duration of approximately 5 min. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of accurate, efficient and patient-friendly language mapping using naturalistic fMRI combined with machine learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.