Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42728092›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

Individualized Network Topography in Pre-adolescent Children and Adults Using Naturalistic Precision fMRI.

Shefali Rai, Kate J Godfrey, Kirk Graff, Ryann Tansey, Daria Merrikh, Shelly Yin, Matthew Feigelis, Damion V Demeter, Tamara Vanderwal, Deanna J Greene and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shefali RaiChild and Adolescent Imaging Research Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada s7rai@health.ucsd.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3287-7961
Kate J GodfreyChild and Adolescent Imaging Research Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2578-2382
Kirk GraffChild and Adolescent Imaging Research Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada.
Ryann TanseyChild and Adolescent Imaging Research Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6865-5893
Daria MerrikhChild and Adolescent Imaging Research Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada.
Shelly YinCommunity Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada.
Matthew FeigelisDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093.
Damion V DemeterDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093.
Tamara VanderwalDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Deanna J GreeneDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093.
Signe BrayChild and Adolescent Imaging Research Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group-averaged network definitions, commonly used in developmental functional connectivity research, limit our understanding of how network topography may change with age and can lead to inaccurate estimates of age effects on intra- and inter-network functional connectivity. Here, we collected a precision fMRI dataset from 24 parent-child pairs (children 6-8 years, 13 females; adults 33-47 years, 12 females) during passive video viewing and derived individual template-matched functional network maps from 60 min of motion-censored data per participant. Overall, large-scale network architecture was broadly shared between children and adults, with no age effects observed for network-level surface area, few age differences in network boundaries, and generally lower assignment confidence in children. Considering interindividual similarity in network topography, association networks showed stronger within-family similarity and no overall effect of age on similarity of networks between pairs of individuals. We further asked how individualized network definitions might impact estimates of age effects on dense functional connectivity. While all approaches pointed to greater within-network functional connectivity in adults, we found that individualized approaches had larger age effects and lower sensitivity to head motion. Together, our results suggest that, relative to adults, preadolescent children show reduced network assignment confidence and weaker within-network connectivity but limited differences in network borders and size and underscore the value of individualized mapping for improving topographic reliability and increasing sensitivity to age effects.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetAdultAge FactorsBrain MappingChildFemaleHumansMaledevelopmental neuroimagingfunctional brain networksfunctional connectivitynaturalistic fMRIprecision fMRI

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.