ArticleESMO open2026
Clinically actionable genomic alterations in breast cancer brain metastases.
Article in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) represent a critical unmet clinical need in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and the identification of novel therapeutic targets is urgently needed in this context. In this study, we describe clinically actionable targets in BCBMs using comprehensive genomic profiling. PATIENTS AND
methodsGenomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archival BCBM samples and analyzed using the commercially available Agilent SureSelect V6 whole exome sequencing (WES) kit and an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Pathogenic alterations were classified as actionable alterations (AAs) if they met the updated MBC or tumor-agnostic ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) I or II criteria of the ESCAT scale.
resultsWES data from 56 BCBM samples were available [33.9% hormone receptor (HR)-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative; 25.0% HR-positive/HER2-negative; and 38% HER2-positive]. ESCAT I/II AAs were detected in 76.8% (n = 43) of all BCBMs and the most frequently detected AAs were in genes involved in the homologous recombination repair pathway (BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2; 53.6% overall). Biallelic inactivation of BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 was observed in 19.6% of samples, with higher rates in HER2-negative BCBMs (26% in HR-negative /HER2-negative and 21% in HR-positive/HER2-negative). ESCAT I/II PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN pathway alterations were present in 48.2% of samples and, in particular, in 50% of HR-positive/HER2-negative BCBMs. No ESR1 mutation was detected in HR-positive/HER2-negative BCBMs. The prognostic impact of previously described AAs was evaluated overall and according to breast cancer subtype. Twenty-three BCBMs (41%) were classified as HER2-positive; among these, 3 (13%) presented a hotspot PIK3CA mutation and 7 (30%) presented a PTEN deletion. Among patients with HER2-positive BCBMs, the identification of a hotspot PIK3CA mutation was significantly associated with worse prognosis.
conclusionsESCAT I/II actionable genomic alterations are frequent in BCBMs, highlighting the potential for genomically targeted treatments in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.