Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42727349›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Myo-inositol metabolism in two high-performance laying hen strains at different production periods.

Ákos Szentgyörgyi, Vera Sommerfeld, Markus Rodehutscord, Korinna Huber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ákos SzentgyörgyiInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 70599, Germany.
Vera SommerfeldInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 70599, Germany.
Markus RodehutscordInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 70599, Germany.
Korinna HuberInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 70599, Germany. Electronic address: korinna.huber@uni-hohenheim.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate myo-inositol (MI) metabolism in two high-performance laying hen strains and to assess the effects of MI or mineral phosphorus supplementation at different production periods. Diets were corn-soybean meal-based and supplemented with MI (0, 1, 2, or 3 g/kg feed) in experiment 1 or with mineral phosphorus (0 or 1 g/kg feed) in experiment 2. Following a 4-week feeding period in metabolic units, ten hens per strain (Lohmann Brown-Classic and Lohmann LSL-Classic) and diet were euthanized at 30 weeks of age (experiment 1) and at 19 and 24 weeks of age (experiment 2). Plasma, liver, muscle, and kidney samples were collected from each hen. Tissue MI concentrations were measured using a commercial spectrophotometric kit, and concentrations of insulin and key enzymes (inositol monophosphatase and MI oxygenase) were quantified using ELISA kits. As diets did not affect tissue MI or enzyme concentrations, data from the two experiments were combined for further analysis. Changes across periods suggest that insulin influenced kidney MI oxygenase concentration and consequently played an essential role in the metabolic adaptation to egg laying. The results also indicated that higher liver and muscle MI concentrations in Lohmann Brown-Classic hens are potentially associated with metabolic adaptation to the onset of egg laying. Further research is needed to elucidate the role and regulation of MI in laying hens, particularly at the onset of egg laying.

Indexed as

InsulinLaying henMetabolic adaptationMyo-inositolOnset of egg laying

Identifiers

PMID42727349
PMCPMC13589128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.