ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Plasma and colostrum concentrations of fentanyl in clinical practice: Intravenous versus epidural administration for labor analgesia.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPain relief during labor is essential. Systemic opioids for labor analgesia have been used for decades as a less invasive alternative to epidural analgesia (EA). Although their analgesic efficacy is generally considered inferior to EA, concerns regarding potential maternal and neonatal adverse effects have likely limited their wider adoption. Measurements of fentanyl concentration may provide an objective assessment of systemic exposure and potential transfer to the fetus and colostrum. The aim of the study was to compare fentanyl concentrations in maternal plasma, umbilical cord blood, and colostrum following intravenous (midwife-administered) versus epidural administration for labor analgesia. We also included a group of women, who initially received intravenous fentanyl but were subsequently converted to EA due to insufficient pain relief. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis prospective study included three groups: women who received fentanyl epidurally only (EA), intravenously only (IV), or intravenously followed by epidural administration (IV + EA). Samples of maternal plasma, arterial and venous umbilical cord plasma, and two colostrum samples were collected for analysis of fentanyl concentration.
resultsA total of 98 women were included: 34 in the EA group, 38 in the IV group and 26 in the IV + EA group. Fentanyl concentrations were significantly higher in the IV group compared to the EA group in maternal plasma (0.25 ng/mL vs. 0.11 ng/mL, p < 0.001) and umbilical vein plasma (0.084 ng/mL vs. 0.054 ng/mL, p < 0.001). However, within the first 24 h postpartum, no significant differences in fentanyl concentrations were observed in colostrum samples between the IV and EA groups (0.020 ng/mL vs. 0.021 ng/mL, p = 0.93). The estimated theoretical infant dose through breastfeeding in the total study population was very low (0.0079 μg). All measured fentanyl concentrations were low and were accompanied by normal early warning scores, with no requirement for naloxone administration or ventilator support in any group.
conclusionsIntravenous fentanyl for labor analgesia was associated with low fentanyl concentrations in maternal plasma, umbilical cord plasma, and colostrum. These findings suggest that intravenous fentanyl may be considered as an additional analgesic option for laboring women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.