Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42727070›Full record

Trial reportJMIR formative research2026

A Mobile App for Student Veterans With Co-Occurring Academic and Psychiatric Concerns: Pilot Usability and Feasibility Study.

Erin Dawna Reilly, Lisa N Mueller, Donna M Crossman, Hannah L Grigorian, Shannon W Schrader, Megan M Kelly, Katarina Bernice, Marsha L Ellison

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05344092 (Designing a Mobile App to Support Academic Success for Student Veterans), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05344092 nacompletednot on this map

Designing a Mobile App to Support Academic Success for Student Veterans

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2023 to 2024Enrolled13ConditionsMental Health, Depression, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, AnxietyArmsVetEd Mobile Application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin Dawna ReillyVeterans Integrated Service Network 1 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1796-954X
Lisa N MuellerVeterans Integrated Service Network 1 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0517-9826
Donna M CrossmanJesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-6131
Hannah L GrigorianVeterans Integrated Service Network 1 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6132-9294
Shannon W SchraderVeterans Integrated Service Network 1 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3173-6964
Megan M KellyVeterans Integrated Service Network 1 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-1129
Katarina BerniceVeterans Integrated Service Network 1 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4886-845X
Marsha L EllisonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3535-4768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 600,000 student veterans use military benefits to pursue higher education annually, with 75% enrolled as full-time students. Advancing their education is an important step toward improving their employment, financial, and social opportunities. However, student veterans also experience high rates of co-occurring psychiatric concerns like substance use disorder (SUD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or depression. For these students, additional psychoeducation, support, and guidance may be required. To support their goals, a mobile app with targeted content for student veterans managing common psychiatric concerns could be particularly helpful.

objectiveThe primary aim of this pilot study was to iteratively revise and assess usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the VetEd mobile app and study procedures. The secondary aim was to explore preliminary changes from preapplication to postapplication use in academic functioning and community reintegration.

methodsThis study used a mixed methods approach; pilot usability testing and iterative revisions were completed across 3 waves of participants (wave 1=4; wave 2=4; wave 3=5; total n=13). Usability was measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS), and acceptability was measured using the Acceptability E-Scale (AES). App use feasibility was collected through app engagement data from the 4 weeks of mobile app use. Study feasibility was assessed by rates of recruitment, retention, and survey completion. Secondary, exploratory measures to assess potential VetEd use outcomes included academic self-efficacy, perceived ability to cope with educational barriers, and community reintegration. Participants were also given the opportunity to complete an exit interview to provide additional feedback.

resultsStudy feasibility was high, with greater than projected rates of recruitment (4-5 per month), retention (13/13, 100%), and survey completion at all 3 time points (100%, 85%, and 100%, respectively). Overall, 85% (11/13) of both usability and acceptability scores were above the predefined benchmarks. Completion of assigned VetEd activities was high, with participants completing, on average, 90.8% of requested app activities. Secondary exploratory outcomes in academic self-efficacy, coping with educational barriers, and community reintegration were nonsignificant but showed feasibility for use in future fully powered randomized VetEd trials. Exit interviews highlighted that VetEd was easy to use, included pertinent information for both academic and mental health functioning, and had vital information on connecting to additional resources.

conclusionsPilot findings suggested that the VetEd mobile app is usable and acceptable as an asynchronous resource for student veterans managing psychiatric concerns. Exit interviews suggested that veterans found app content useful, with relevant information and resources to support their academic functioning. Additional research is needed to assess its effectiveness, implementation, and impact on student veterans nationwide.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05344092: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05344092.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMobile ApplicationsStudentsVeteransAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurveys and Questionnaireshigher educationmental healthmobile applicationpilot trialusabilityveterans

Identifiers

PMID42727070
PMCPMC13615383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.