ArticleJCO precision oncology2026
Evaluation of a Tumor-Informed Molecular Residual Disease Assay in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, With or Without Atezolizumab.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDetection of molecular residual disease (MRD) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is strongly associated with recurrence risk in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Prior studies suggest that ctDNA clearance during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) may predict pathologic complete response (pCR) and enhance the prognostic value of pCR. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-59/German Breast Group-96-GeparDouze evaluated atezolizumab added to NAT and as adjuvant therapy in 1,550 patients with stage II/III TNBC. For prospective ctDNA substudy on serial blood samples, we used whole-exome sequencing of primary tumors to generate patient-specific tumor-informed assays to correlate ctDNA status with distant recurrence and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis substudy included NSABP B-59 patients with serial blood collections before NAT (baseline), after NAT before surgery, 3-6 weeks postsurgery, and 12 and 24 months after random assignment. The primary objective was to evaluate the association between ctDNA status postsurgery with distant recurrence-free interval, defined from the date of surgery to first distant metastasis or death from breast cancer. The median follow-up for the primary end point was 37 months.
resultsAt baseline, ctDNA was detected in 153 of 160 patients (96%). Among 147 patients with ctDNA assessment postsurgery, ctDNA was detected in nine (6%). Distant recurrence occurred in seven of nine (77.8%) patients with ctDNA-positive status postsurgery, compared with seven of 138 (5%) with ctDNA-negative status postsurgery (log-rank
conclusionThe tumor-informed MRD assay demonstrated high baseline ctDNA prevalence, marked clearance with NAT, and strong prognostic utility of post-NAT and postsurgery ctDNA-positive status for distant recurrence in early TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.