ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026
Patients' conceptions of opting out of group-based education for type 2 diabetes in Swedish primary care - a phenomenographic interview study.
Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeType 2 diabetes affects everyday life, requiring patients to learn to live with the illness. Although group-based education can improve clinical outcomes and support self-care, it remains underutilised in Sweden. Only about a fifth of healthcare centres offer group-based education, and many patients opt out of participation. Understanding the various reasons patients opt out is crucial for designing group-based education that meets individual needs and promotes long-term disease management. This study aims to describe variations in the conceptions of patients with type 2 diabetes who opted out of group-based education.
methodsA phenomenographic approach was applied based on 18 individual interviews with patients in primary care who opted out of group-based education for type 2 diabetes.
resultsThree conceptions emerged regarding group-based education for type 2 diabetes, reflecting patients' varied views and understanding. Some patients saw no need for group-based education and preferred individual learning. Others recognised the benefits and barriers of group-based education, such as inflexible schedules. Others appreciated the reflective and supportive environment, shared experiences, and greater self-insight.
conclusionsPatients who declined group-based education held varied conceptions, from preferring individual counselling to recognising benefits. Understanding these variations supports more personalised education and better long-term self-management. These insights may inform clinical and assistive practices by promoting more flexible and person-centered approaches to diabetes education within primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.