Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42726860›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Top-down corticostriatal control of adaptive restraint during motivational conflict.

Elizabeth Illescas-Huerta, Eduardo Hernández-Ortiz, Francisco Sotres-Bayon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth Illescas-HuertaNeuroscience Division, Institute of Cell Physiology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0005-4097-1666
Eduardo Hernández-OrtizNeuroscience Division, Institute of Cell Physiology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1503-4097
Francisco Sotres-BayonNeuroscience Division, Institute of Cell Physiology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3829-7463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive behavior under threat requires withholding reward pursuit when past experiences predict danger. Here, we identified a corticostriatal circuit that enables behavioral restraint during motivational conflict. Using a seminaturalistic foraging task in male rats, we found that inactivation of the prelimbic cortex (PL) abolished restraint without impairing memory, and single-unit recordings revealed transient PL firing increases at decision points in conflict trials. c-Fos mapping showed selective engagement of the PL and nucleus accumbens core (NAcC) but not the nucleus accumbens shell. Inactivation further revealed that the anterior NAcC (aNAcC), but not the posterior NAcC, is necessary for restraint as posterior disruption broadly reduced reward-seeking regardless of threat. Silencing PL→aNAcC projections reproduced aNAcC effects without affecting memory or motivation, and this pathway was required under learned, but not innate, threats. Together, these findings identify a corticostriatal pathway through which PL control of aNAcC supports learned threat-guided restraint during reward seeking, revealing a top-down circuit architecture for adaptive action control during motivational conflict.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalCorpus StriatumMotivationNucleus AccumbensPrefrontal CortexAnimalsBehavior, AnimalMaleMemoryRatsReward

Identifiers

PMID42726860
PMCPMC13564925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.