ArticlePLOS digital health2026
The development of a technologic approach to improve access to individualized clinical documentation in caregivers' preferred language.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This pilot study aims to describe the process of developing a template that semi-automatically translates information from English to Spanish to improve caregivers' access to clinical documents in their preferred language. It used human-centered design and the Discover, Design/Build, and Test Framework to improve health literacy outcomes for patients who use a language other than English. The Discover Phase revealed current methods and barriers to clinicians providing patients access to written documentation in their primary language. During the Design/Build Phase, an interprofessional team of a speech-language pathologist and a certified translation specialist developed the template in the electronic health record. In the Test Phase, we evaluated the template's acceptability and feasibility and surveyed speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and patients' caregivers. Clinicians affirmed the importance of the template, but also had concerns regarding feasibility and usability. Caregivers found it helpful to receive their child's health information in their primary language. The results showed that sustainable access to written documentation in patients' preferred language is lacking, and this template is prepared to reduce language barriers in an overwhelmed healthcare system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.