ArticlePloS one2026
GenBank mining reveals novel insights into Rhizobium phylogeny: Identical 16S rRNA sequences are mainly uncoupled from species designation, host plant, and geographic origin: How this search suggested the definition of a direct 'microbial h-index'.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
16S rDNA is the historical gold standard for bacterial identification, particularly in metabarcoding approaches reliant on sequence similarity thresholds. We analyzed 6,660 Rhizobium 16S rRNA gene sequences from GenBank to examine the relationship between sequence identity and three metadata: species name, host plant, and geographic origin. Using an iterative BLAST-based pipeline, we detected 116,069 pairwise matches and assessed concordance among sequences (average length 1,328 bp) sharing 100% identity. For those in which the organism name, host plant and country of isolation were present in the record, surprisingly, 66.59% of identical sequence pairs showed full discordance across all three metadata, while only 1.40% shared the same name, host, and country. The most widespread sequence, detected 371 times, was associated with over 56 different host plants across 25 countries and bore multiple species name designations. These results highlight a striking mismatch between the 16S barcode and the taxonomic, ecological, and phenotypic variability it is assumed to reflect, likely arising from the slow evolution of rRNA genes contrasted with the mobility of ecologically relevant genes via horizontal transfer on plasmids, transposons, and phages. Our findings further challenge the limitations of relying on 16S rRNA alone for fine-scale taxonomic and metadata-based inference in capturing the true functional and ecological diversity of bacteria, endorsing the critical importance of polyphasic taxonomic approaches that integrate genomic, phenotypic, and ecological data. An interesting byproduct of the analysis was to realize the possibility of treating these data as if they were 'citations.' The more one finds the same query sequence, the more that sequence can be considered biologically 'cited', i.e., re-proposed elsewhere in the world. Thus, one can also analyze the h-index of such a ranking. In our Rhizobium dataset, we calculated an h-index = 201, meaning the sequence ranked 201st had 202 identical homologues in GenBank. Although the research effort on given species is directly connected with it, this number provides a quantitative indicator of a taxon's sequence recurrence and distribution within public databases, independent of nomenclatural inconsistencies, offering a novel framework for assessing bacterial representation across global datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.