ArticlePloS one2026
ElecMeter: An index for evaluating dissatisfaction of social decision-making.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding dissatisfaction in social decision-making is important for diagnosing structural features of collective outcomes that may be informative about differences in acceptance and cohesion. Existing electoral metrics typically focus on satisfaction or utility, overlooking dissatisfaction as an independent and socially meaningful factor. We introduce ElecMeter, a novel index for single-winner elections that defines voter dissatisfaction as the normalized rank of the elected candidate and incorporates both average and distributional features. A divergence-based component compares the observed distribution to benchmarks of maximal dissatisfaction, polarization, and neutrality using Jensen-Shannon divergence. Scores are aggregated via a generalized mean controlling sensitivity to extreme dissatisfaction. Simulations show that ElecMeter distinguishes electorates with similar average dissatisfaction but different distributional structures. Applied to the classic Breakfast Items dataset, ElecMeter consistently identifies winners across parameter settings and aligns with several classical voting rules, demonstrating internal robustness of the index. All code and data are available on GitHub, ensuring reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.